Recalibrating the Fibonacci Table, acc. to Abraham in Chalcolithic En Gedi

1) Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Osgood and the Dating of Abraham? And I am Wrong on Fibonacci Table · 2) Creation vs. Evolution : Recalibrating the Fibonacci Table, acc. to Abraham in Chalcolithic En Gedi · 3) If Göbekli Tepe is Tower of Babel ...

I had looked at En Gedi's Chalcolithic due to Osgood, over here:

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Osgood and the Dating of Abraham? And I am Wrong on Fibonacci Table
HGL, Tuesday, January 31, 2017
http://filolohika.blogspot.com/2017/01/osgood-and-dating-of-abraham-and-i-am.html

(Includes a link to Osgood's article.)

I had concluded that the Fibonacci table from over here needed reshaping, since being in error:

New blog on the kid : Avec un peu d'aide de Fibonacci ... j'ai une table, presque correcte
HGL, Saturday, 31 October 2015
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2015/10/avec-un-peu-daide-de-fibonacci-jai-une.html

But actually, 1972 was not exactly the year I was looking for either. So, I want to know how old Abraham was in En Gedi.

While for my own part I use the chronology of Roman Martyrology for Christmas Day, Haydock gives extensive dates according to Ussher's table of chronology.

Genesis 12. Abraham 75:

Year of the World 2084, Year before Christ 1920. (Ussher, as per Haydock comment)

Genesis 14. Abraham in En Gedi :

Year of the World 2092, Year before Christ 1912. (Ussher, as per Haydock comment)

Abraham 83 (and as fine a young warrior as Aragorn at the age!)* and according to calculation below, that gives the year BC:

Martyrology Chronology

2015
0075
1940 Genesis 12
0008
1932 Genesis 14

Calculating another mid point from below table:

1972 094.05509 %
1883 094.86521 %
3855 188.9201 % : 1.9867796634825349**
1928 95.0886016564366408599 %! (Let's stick with :2!)
1928 94.46005 % + 470 = 2398

It is inserted* where underlined.

2957 BC

3.90625 % + 26 800 years, 29 757 BC

2868 BC

28.41464 % + 10 400 years, 13 268 BC

2778 BC

40.23593 % + 7550 years, 10 328 BC

2688 BC

58.52169 % + 4450 years, 7138 BC

2599 BC

62.75068 % + 3850 years, 6449 BC

2510 BC

73.24848 % + 2550 years, 5060 BC

2420 BC

76.66562 % + 2200 years, 4620 BC

2330 BC

83.68212 % (?) + 1450 ans (?). 3780 BC

2241 BC

86.26541 % + 1200 years, 3441 BC

2152 BC

90.54925 % + 820 years, 2972 BC

2062 BC

91.58056 % + 730 years, 2792 BC

1972 BC

94.05509 % + 510 years, 2482 BC

1928

94.46005 % + 470 years, 2398 BC

1883 BC

94.86521 % + 440 years, 2323 BC

1794 BC

96.39213 % + 300 years, 2094 BC

1704 BC

96.89571 % + 260 years, 1964 BC

1614 BC

97.83779 % + 180 years, 1794 BC

1525 BC

98.14985 % + 150 years, 1675 BC

1436 BC

98.73274 % + 110 years, 1546 BC

1346 BC

98.92632 % + 90 years, 1436 BC

1256 BC

99.28488 % + 60 years, 1316 BC

1167 BC

99.40408 % + 50 years, 1217 BC

1078 BC

99.62811 % + 30 years, 1108 BC

988 BC

99.70269 % + 30 years, 1018 BC

898 BC

99.8371 % + 10 years, 908 BC

809 BC

99.88185 % + 10 years, 819 BC

720 BC

99.95645 % 0 years ±. 720 BC

630 BC

100.00129 % 0 years ±. 630 BC

What exactly do we need now, to get 1928 in line with En Gedi Chalcolithic?

I

We need to determine what the C14 % in relation to todays would have been to get so many extra years we land in 3400 BC.

Doing

3400-1928=1472 extra years. 1472 extra years is

Done

83.689 %.

II

We need to see the difference between 83.689 % and 94.46005 % so we can apply the percentage to rest of % values.

But

We also need to land on 100 %, and this should remain 100 %.

So

we should rather ...

III

... need to see the difference between 100 % - 83.689 % and 100 % - 94.46005 %.

Doing

100 % - 83.689 % = 16.311 %
100 % - 94.46005 % = 5.53995 %
16.311 % / 5.53995 % = ...

Done

... = 2.9442503993718355

But

now we see a problem going back in time. 100 % - 3.90625 % = 96.09375 %, and we cannot do 100 % - 2.9442503993718355*96.09375 % since that lands on a nonsensical minus number.

So

we should rather ...

IV

also see the proportion in percentages as positive things.

Doing

83.689 % / 94.46005 % = ...

Done

... = 0.8859724296144243. And we start trying to apply it around 1928 BC, Abraham in chalcolithic En Gedi. From then on, percentages up to 100 % compared. From then back, percentages compared.

See where this gets us:

I, Flood, 2957 BC

0.8859724296144243*3.90625 % = 3.461 %

3.461 % = + 27,800 years, 30,757 BC

II 2868 BC

0.8859724296144243*28.41464 % = 25.175 %

25.175 % = + 11,400 years, 14,268 BC

III 2778 BC

0.8859724296144243*40.23593 % = 35.648 %

35.648 % = + 8550 years, 11,328 BC

IV 2688 BC

0.8859724296144243*58.52169 % = 51.849 %

51.849 % = + 5450 years, 8138 BC

V 2599 BC

0.8859724296144243*62.75068 % = 55.595 %

55.595 % = + 4850 years, 7449 BC

VI 2510 BC

0.8859724296144243*73.24848 % = 64.896 %

64.896 % = + 3550 years, 6060 BC

VII 2420 BC

0.8859724296144243*76.66562 % = 67.924 %

67.924 % = + 3200 years, 5620 BC

VIII 2330 BC

0.8859724296144243*83.68212 % = 74.14 %

74.14 % = + 2450 years, 4780 BC

IX 2241 BC

0.8859724296144243*86.26541 % = 76.429 %

76.429 % = + 2200 years, 4441 BC

X 2152 BC

0.8859724296144243*90.54925 % = 80.224 %

80.224 % = + 1800 years, 3952 BC

XI 2062 BC

0.8859724296144243*91.58056 % = 81.138 %

81.138 % = + 1750 years, 3812 BC

XII 1972 BC

0.8859724296144243*94.05509 % = 83.33 %

83.33 % = + 1500 years, 3472 BC

Mid pt. 1928

83.689 % + 1472 years, 3400 BC

XIII 1883 BC

100 % - 94.86521 % = 5.13479 %, 2.9442503993718355*5.13479 % = 15.118 %

100 % - 15.118 % = 84.882 %, + 1350 years, 3233 BC

XIV 1794 BC

100 % - 96.39213 % = 3.60787 %, 2.9442503993718355*3.60787 % = 10.622 %

100 % - 10.622 % = 89.378 %, + 930 years, 2724 BC

XV 1704 BC

100 % - 96.89571 % = 3.10429 %, 2.9442503993718355*3.10429 % = 9.14 %

100 % - 9.14 % = 90.86 %, + 790 years, 2494 BC

XVI 1614 BC

100 % - 97.83779 % = 2.16221 %, 2.9442503993718355*2.16221 % = 6.366 %

100 % - 6.366 % = 93.634 %, + 540 years, 2154 BC

XVII 1525 BC

100 % - 98.14985 % = 1.85015 %, 2.9442503993718355*1.85015 % = 5.447 %

100 % - 5.447 % = 94.553 %, + 460 years, 1985 BC

XVIII 1436 BC

100 % - 98.73274 % = 1.26726 %, 2.9442503993718355*1.26726 % = 3.731 %

100 % - 3.731 % = 96.269 %, + 310 years, 1746 BC

XIX 1346 BC BC

100 % - 98.92632 % = 1.07368 %, 2.9442503993718355*1.07368 % = 3.161 %

100 % - 3.161 % = 96.839 %, + 270 years, 1616 BC

XX 1256 BC

100 % - 99.28488 % = 0.71512 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.71512 % = 2.105 %

100 % - 2.105 % = 97.895 %, + 180 years, 1436 BC

XXI 1167 BC

100 % - 99.40408 % = 0.59592 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.59592 % = 1.755 %

100 % - 1.755 % = 98.245 %, + 150 years, 1317 BC

XXII 1078 BC

100 % - 99.62811 % = 0.37189 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.37189 % = 1.095 %

100 % - 1.095 % = 98.905 %, + 90 years, 1168 BC

XXIII 988 BC

100 % - 99.70269 % = 0.29731 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.29731 % = 0.875 %

100 % - 0.875 % = 99.125 %, + 70 years, 1058 BC

XXIV 898 BC

100 % - 99.8371 % = 0.1629 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.1629 % = 0.48 %

100 % - 0.48 % = 99.52 %, + 40 years, 938 BC

XXV 809 BC

100 % - 99.88185 % = 0.11815 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.11815 % = 0.348 %

100 % - 0.348 % = 99.652 %, + 30 years, 839 BC

XXVI 720 BC

100 % - 99.95645 % = 0.04355 %, 2.9442503993718355*0.04355 % = 0.128 %

100 % - 0.128 % = 99.872 %, + 10 years, 730 BC

XXVII 630 BC

"100 % - 100.00129 %" = "-0.00129 %", "2.9442503993718355*-0.00129 %" = "-0.004 %'

"100 % -(-0.004 %)" = 100.004 %, 0 ans ±. 630 BC

If we clean the table up ...

I, Flood, 2957 BC

3.461 % = + 27,800 years, 30,757 BC

II 2868 BC

25.175 % = + 11,400 years, 14,268 BC

III 2778 BC

35.648 % = + 8550 years, 11,328 BC

IV 2688 BC

51.849 % = + 5450 years, 8138 BC

V 2599 BC

55.595 % = + 4850 years, 7449 BC

VI 2510 BC

64.896 % = + 3550 years, 6060 BC

VII 2420 BC

67.924 % = + 3200 years, 5620 BC

VIII 2330 BC

74.14 % = + 2450 years, 4780 BC

IX 2241 BC

76.429 % = + 2200 years, 4441 BC

X 2152 BC

80.224 % = + 1800 years, 3952 BC

XI 2062 BC

81.138 % = + 1750 years, 3812 BC

XII 1972 BC

83.33 % = + 1500 years, 3472 BC

Mid pt. 1928

83.689 % + 1472 years, 3400 BC

XIII 1883 BC

84.882 %, + 1350 years, 3233 BC

XIV 1794 BC

89.378 %, + 930 years, 2724 BC

XV 1704 BC

90.86 %, + 790 years, 2494 BC

XVI 1614 BC

93.634 %, + 540 years, 2154 BC

XVII 1525 BC

94.553 %, + 460 years, 1985 BC

XVIII 1436 BC

96.269 %, + 310 years, 1746 BC

XIX 1346 BC

96.839 %, + 270 years, 1616 BC

XX 1256 BC

97.895 %, + 180 years, 1436 BC

XXI 1167 BC

98.245 %, + 150 years, 1317 BC

XXII 1078 BC

98.905 %, + 90 years, 1168 BC

XXIII 988 BC

99.125 %, + 70 years, 1058 BC

XXIV 898 BC

99.52 %, + 40 years, 938 BC

XXV 809 BC

99.652 %, + 30 years, 839 BC

XXVI 720 BC

99.872 %, + 10 years, 730 BC

XXVII 630 BC

100.004 %, 0 ans ±. 630 BC

... the table we get is in a way more useful than the Fibonacci based ones. But it is also less coherent in principle, which is why, perhaps, it should be replaced by a new table made from scratch.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Scholastica
10.II.2017

Update : the "BC" was lacking after some years in the tables, has - hopefully completely - been supplied today. It were the years between those given in original Fibonacci table, as I was not writing them out separately after each new calculation, but they were there after editing all "av. J. Chr." to "BC" on the original years.HGL, 13.II.2017

* Reference to Lord of the Rings. Abraham in Genesis 14 and Aragorn or Strider in Lord of the Rings comparably both are 80 (or supposed to be in LotR), while fighting like we expect of well trained men of 40.

** Not in the original Fibonacci table, but in a refinement of it:

New blog on the kid : Raffiner et finir ma table de Fibonacci?
HGL, Tuesday, 7 February 2017
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2017/02/raffiner-et-finir-ma-table-de-fibonacci.html